The digital landscape of global betting is undergoing a seismic shift as national regulators take an increasingly aggressive stance against decentralized prediction markets. This week, the Autorité Nationale des Jeux (ANJ)—France’s independent regulatory body overseeing gambling and betting—announced a decisive escalation in its efforts to curb the reach of Polymarket. By ordering internet service providers (ISPs) to implement a comprehensive block on the platform’s website, French authorities are attempting to cut off access at the infrastructure level, signaling a new, more rigid phase in the battle between decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms and sovereign regulators.
The Core Conflict: Defining Prediction Markets
At the heart of this controversy lies a fundamental disagreement over classification. Polymarket, a platform built on blockchain technology, allows users to bet on the outcomes of real-world events, ranging from geopolitical elections to macroeconomic trends and sporting events. While proponents view these platforms as "information markets" that aggregate collective intelligence, the ANJ maintains a starkly different position: Polymarket is an unlicensed, illegal gambling operation.
The French regulator’s move to mandate ISP blocking is not merely a technical request; it is a declaration that the platform’s continued operations in France constitute a violation of national law. By bypassing the traditional licensing requirements mandated for betting entities in France, the ANJ argues that Polymarket evades consumer protections, tax obligations, and anti-money laundering (AML) protocols.
A Chronology of Escalation
The relationship between the ANJ and Polymarket has deteriorated significantly over the past six months, transitioning from warnings to direct administrative intervention.
- November 2024: The ANJ issued its initial regulatory strike, imposing a geoblock on all financial transactions originating from French IP addresses. This move was intended to starve the platform of its French user base by making it impossible for residents to fund their accounts or withdraw winnings.
- The "Workaround" Phase: Despite the transactional ban, the ANJ observed that the platform’s popularity in France did not wane. Users, increasingly tech-savvy, utilized Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and other proxy services to circumvent the geographical restrictions, effectively rendering the initial financial block toothless.
- June 2025 Data Analysis: The ANJ’s resolve was hardened by a sobering data report from the month of June, which revealed that French residents had visited the site nearly 579,000 times. With over 200,000 unique visitors in a single month, it became clear to regulators that the platform was not just surviving in France but thriving, directly undermining the state’s regulatory authority.
- Present Day: Facing this persistent non-compliance, the ANJ has moved to the nuclear option: ordering French ISPs to block access to the website entirely, effectively attempting to "de-platform" the site from the French internet.
Supporting Data: The Scale of the "Illegal" Market
The statistics provided by the ANJ serve as a potent justification for their recent crackdown. When a platform attracts hundreds of thousands of visits from a single jurisdiction, it signals a systemic failure of the existing regulatory barrier.
According to internal monitoring by the ANJ, the engagement levels of French users on Polymarket suggest a high degree of normalization for what the state considers illicit activity. For the regulator, this is not just about gambling; it is about the erosion of the "French model" of gaming, which relies on strict state oversight to prevent addiction and ensure financial integrity. The fact that users are actively seeking out ways to bypass state-imposed filters suggests that the demand for these prediction markets is outpacing the current legal frameworks designed to regulate them.
Official Responses and Legal Teeth
The ANJ is not merely blocking websites; it is also preparing for a wider crackdown on the promotion of such platforms. Under the latest directive, the authority has warned that any entity or individual found advertising, promoting, or facilitating access to unauthorized gambling sites like Polymarket could face severe financial penalties. The threat of fines up to 100,000 euros ($114,000) is intended to discourage influencers, affiliates, and marketing partners from pushing the platform to French audiences.
"The platform is considered an illegal gambling site," the ANJ stated in its formal announcement, doubling down on the premise that no matter the underlying technology—blockchain or otherwise—the activity remains subject to the French Code of Internal Security, which governs all betting and gambling activities.
A Global Wave of Regulatory Resistance
France is not acting in a vacuum. The pressure on prediction markets is a global trend, as governments struggle to fit decentralized, borderless platforms into localized legal boxes.

The European Context: The Spanish Example
Across the border, Spain has adopted a similarly combative stance. The Spanish government has ordered the blocking of both Polymarket and its competitor, Kalshi, while ongoing investigations determine whether these platforms violate the nation’s stringent gambling laws. The Spanish approach mirrors the French strategy: prioritize containment through infrastructure blocking while a long-term legal strategy is formulated.
The North American Landscape
In the United States, the resistance is taking a more litigious form.
- State-Level Bans: Minnesota has taken legislative action, passing a bill that explicitly bans prediction markets from operating within its borders, creating a clear legal precedent for other states to follow.
- Litigation: Other states, most notably Nevada—a region with a deep-rooted and highly regulated gambling industry—have initiated lawsuits against both Polymarket and Kalshi. The central argument is that these platforms are operating as de facto sportsbooks and financial exchanges without the requisite licenses.
Implications for the Future of Prediction Markets
The crackdown in France and abroad raises existential questions for the future of decentralized prediction markets.
The Technical Arms Race
The effectiveness of the ANJ’s move is highly debatable. In an era where VPNs are ubiquitous, blocking a website at the ISP level is often seen as a temporary inconvenience rather than a permanent solution. This creates a "cat-and-mouse" game where regulators must constantly update their blacklists, while platforms like Polymarket may look to decentralized web protocols (like IPFS) to bypass traditional ISP filtering.
The "Regulation by Enforcement" Model
The current situation highlights a shift toward "regulation by enforcement." Rather than creating new, specialized frameworks for prediction markets, states are defaulting to existing gambling laws. This creates a high barrier to entry for these platforms, as they would need to navigate dozens of different regulatory environments, each with its own set of compliance costs and requirements.
Implications for Decentralization
For the blockchain industry, the French crackdown is a test case. If platforms like Polymarket are successfully pushed into the "shadows" of the internet, it may strengthen the resolve of those who believe that decentralized protocols are inherently immune to state control. Conversely, if these platforms are forced to geofence and comply with local laws to survive, it could signal the end of the "wild west" era of DeFi, forcing them to become more centralized and compliant with the very entities they sought to disrupt.
Conclusion: A Regulatory Crossroads
The ANJ’s decision to block Polymarket is a definitive moment in the regulation of the internet’s new frontier. By attempting to enforce national borders on a platform designed to be borderless, France has staked its claim in a larger debate about the role of the state in the digital economy.
As governments in Europe and the United States continue to align their strategies against unlicensed prediction markets, the pressure on companies like Polymarket will only increase. Whether these platforms will adapt, comply, or continue to fight for their vision of an open, decentralized future remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the era of unfettered access to global prediction markets is closing, replaced by a new, more scrutinized landscape where the law of the land is increasingly reaching into the digital realm.







